Smart Contract Audits
[ ZANVEXIS // HIGH-PERFORMANCE INFRASTRUCTURE ]

Smart Contract Audits

We deliver rigorous manual line-by-line source code audits, automated symbolic execution, property-based invariant fuzzing, and mathematical formal verification for Solana (Rust/Anchor) and EVM (Solidity/Foundry) protocols to eliminate vulnerabilities prior to mainnet deployment.

Smart Contract Audits
100%Manual Line-by-Line Review
0Post-Audit Exploits
100k+Lines of Code Audited
[ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS // CORE CAPABILITIES ]

Core Capabilities

Deep Manual Code Review & Logic Analysis

Deep Manual Code Review & Logic Analysis

  • Exhaustive line-by-line inspection of Rust (Anchor) and Solidity/Yul state machines
  • Discovery of complex logical flaws, race conditions, and business invariant violations
  • Auditing cross-program invocations (CPI), arbitrary account loading, and signer checks
  • Analysis of precision loss, rounding directions, and arithmetic edge cases in token math
Property-Based Invariant Testing & Fuzzing

Property-Based Invariant Testing & Fuzzing

  • Automated invariant fuzzing using Foundry, Echidna, and custom Trident test harnesses
  • Generation of millions of pseudorandom instruction sequences to break protocol bounds
  • Stateful fuzz testing verifying constant collateralization ratios and pool balances
  • Differential fuzzing comparing optimized Rust implementations against reference models
Formal Verification & Symbolic Execution

Formal Verification & Symbolic Execution

  • Mathematical specification and verification of protocol core state transition proofs
  • Symbolic execution using Manticore and Certora Prover to detect unreachable paths
  • Formal validation of liquidation curves, fee splits, and mint/burn invariant constraints
  • Verification of cryptographic signature schemes and zero-knowledge circuit constraints
Adversarial Exploit & Flash-Loan Simulation

Adversarial Exploit & Flash-Loan Simulation

  • Development of executable Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploit scripts for all discovered issues
  • Simulation of complex multi-block flash loan borrowing, oracle desync, and pool drain attacks
  • Testing protocol resilience against MEV sandwiching and transaction reordering vectors
  • Validation of emergency pause mechanisms and circuit breaker responsiveness under attack
Remediation Guidance & Re-Audit Certification

Remediation Guidance & Re-Audit Certification

  • Actionable code patch recommendations and architectural refactoring support
  • Collaborative verification of remediated branches to ensure zero regression bugs
  • Publication of an institutional-grade audit report with clear severity rankings (CVSS)
  • Cryptographically signed on-chain verification certificate attesting to audit completion
Deep Manual Code Review & Logic Analysis

Deep Manual Code Review & Logic Analysis

  • Exhaustive line-by-line inspection of Rust (Anchor) and Solidity/Yul state machines
  • Discovery of complex logical flaws, race conditions, and business invariant violations
  • Auditing cross-program invocations (CPI), arbitrary account loading, and signer checks
  • Analysis of precision loss, rounding directions, and arithmetic edge cases in token math
Property-Based Invariant Testing & Fuzzing

Property-Based Invariant Testing & Fuzzing

  • Automated invariant fuzzing using Foundry, Echidna, and custom Trident test harnesses
  • Generation of millions of pseudorandom instruction sequences to break protocol bounds
  • Stateful fuzz testing verifying constant collateralization ratios and pool balances
  • Differential fuzzing comparing optimized Rust implementations against reference models
Formal Verification & Symbolic Execution

Formal Verification & Symbolic Execution

  • Mathematical specification and verification of protocol core state transition proofs
  • Symbolic execution using Manticore and Certora Prover to detect unreachable paths
  • Formal validation of liquidation curves, fee splits, and mint/burn invariant constraints
  • Verification of cryptographic signature schemes and zero-knowledge circuit constraints
Adversarial Exploit & Flash-Loan Simulation

Adversarial Exploit & Flash-Loan Simulation

  • Development of executable Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploit scripts for all discovered issues
  • Simulation of complex multi-block flash loan borrowing, oracle desync, and pool drain attacks
  • Testing protocol resilience against MEV sandwiching and transaction reordering vectors
  • Validation of emergency pause mechanisms and circuit breaker responsiveness under attack
Remediation Guidance & Re-Audit Certification

Remediation Guidance & Re-Audit Certification

  • Actionable code patch recommendations and architectural refactoring support
  • Collaborative verification of remediated branches to ensure zero regression bugs
  • Publication of an institutional-grade audit report with clear severity rankings (CVSS)
  • Cryptographically signed on-chain verification certificate attesting to audit completion
[ EXECUTION PIPELINE // OPERATIONAL WORKFLOW ]

How It Works

Scoping & Threat Modeling
01CORE DIRECTIVE

Scoping & Threat Modeling

We dissect protocol whitepapers, technical specifications, and smart contract interfaces to map all trust boundaries, user roles, external dependencies, and privileged keys.

Automated Fuzzing & Static Analysis
02CORE DIRECTIVE

Automated Fuzzing & Static Analysis

We run custom static analyzers and invariant fuzzers across the codebase to identify standard vulnerability classes, arithmetic overflow risks, and unchecked external calls.

Manual Line-by-Line Inspection
03CORE DIRECTIVE

Manual Line-by-Line Inspection

Our senior security engineers manually examine every line of code, validating business logic assumptions, account validation macros, and complex state transition mechanics.

PoC Exploit Development & Remediation
04CORE DIRECTIVE

PoC Exploit Development & Remediation

We write working exploit scripts to prove vulnerability severity and collaborate directly with your engineering team to implement precise, gas-efficient code fixes.

Re-Audit & Cryptographic Certification
05CORE DIRECTIVE

Re-Audit & Cryptographic Certification

We re-verify the patched codebase, mathematically confirm all invariant constraints hold, and deliver the final public report and signed audit attestation.

[ TARGET ARCHITECTURES // PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS ]

Target Scenarios

USE_CASE // 01

Lending, Borrowing & Collateral Markets

Auditing interest rate curves, liquidation triggers, and multi-collateral vault architectures against price oracle manipulation and bad debt accumulation.

USE_CASE // 02

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) & DEXs

Verifying concentrated liquidity math, tick-spacing logic, swap routing, and fee accumulation algorithms across high-throughput decentralized exchanges.

USE_CASE // 03

Cross-Chain Bridges & Message Relayers

Auditing threshold signature verifiers, multi-sig consensus contracts, and deposit/withdrawal queues against double-spending and validator hijacking.

USE_CASE // 04

Liquid Staking & Yield Aggregators

Inspecting epoch-based rewards compounding, unbonding queue logic, and validator delegation mechanics for non-custodial staking protocols.

USE_CASE // 05

Real-World Asset (RWA) & Escrow Vaults

Ensuring compliance-gated tokenization vaults, programmatic escrow settlements, and multi-party governance timelocks execute without state deadlocks.

USE_CASE // 01

Lending, Borrowing & Collateral Markets

Auditing interest rate curves, liquidation triggers, and multi-collateral vault architectures against price oracle manipulation and bad debt accumulation.

USE_CASE // 02

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) & DEXs

Verifying concentrated liquidity math, tick-spacing logic, swap routing, and fee accumulation algorithms across high-throughput decentralized exchanges.

USE_CASE // 03

Cross-Chain Bridges & Message Relayers

Auditing threshold signature verifiers, multi-sig consensus contracts, and deposit/withdrawal queues against double-spending and validator hijacking.

USE_CASE // 04

Liquid Staking & Yield Aggregators

Inspecting epoch-based rewards compounding, unbonding queue logic, and validator delegation mechanics for non-custodial staking protocols.

USE_CASE // 05

Real-World Asset (RWA) & Escrow Vaults

Ensuring compliance-gated tokenization vaults, programmatic escrow settlements, and multi-party governance timelocks execute without state deadlocks.

[ ECOSYSTEM & TOOLING // PRODUCTION STACK ]

Tech Stack

CORE_ENGINE // ACTIVE
PRODUCTION_READY
RustLanguages
SolidityLanguages
YulLanguages
TypeScriptLanguages
AnchorFrameworks
FoundryFrameworks
HardhatFrameworks
TridentFrameworks
SlitherAnalysis Tools
EchidnaAnalysis Tools
CertoraAnalysis Tools
ManticoreAnalysis Tools
SolanaChains Audited
EthereumChains Audited
ArbitrumChains Audited
BaseChains Audited
PolygonChains Audited
[ PROVEN DELIVERIES // BENCHMARKS ]

Case Studies

Solana Lending Protocol Security Audit ($60M TVL)
CASE // 01PRODUCTION VERIFIED

Solana Lending Protocol Security Audit ($60M TVL)

Conducted a comprehensive security audit of a Solana Anchor lending protocol. Identified 8 vulnerabilities, including a critical arbitrary CPI signer exploit and a rounding-direction error in interest compounding, protecting $60M in assets.

8 IssuesIdentified & Remediated
$60MTVL Secured
View Case Study
Foundry Invariant Fuzzing for Concentrated Liquidity AMM
CASE // 02PRODUCTION VERIFIED

Foundry Invariant Fuzzing for Concentrated Liquidity AMM

Engineered an automated invariant testing suite running 500,000 fuzz runs. Discovered a subtle precision-loss vector during extreme single-tick liquidity imbalances that could have enabled zero-cost liquidity extraction.

500k+Fuzz Sequences Run
100%Math Invariants Proven
View Case Study
[ VERIFIED REVIEWS // CLIENT ENDORSEMENTS ]

What Our Clients Say

VERIFIED REVIEW // 01

"Zanvexis uncovered an architectural account-validation vulnerability in our Anchor program that two previous automated security tools completely missed. Their deep knowledge of the Solana runtime is exceptional."

Nikolai Petrov
Nikolai PetrovLead Smart Contract Engineer · Vortex Perpetual Exchange
VERIFIED REVIEW // 02

"The proof-of-concept exploits they provided made remediation straightforward for our dev team. The final audit report gave our institutional backers complete confidence prior to mainnet launch."

Claire Sterling
Claire SterlingCo-Founder & CEO · Hyperion Liquidity Network
[ TECHNICAL CLARIFICATIONS // FAQ ]

Frequently Asked Questions

QWhat is the difference between automated scanning and a manual smart contract audit?

Automated tools quickly flag known syntactic patterns and common code smells, but they cannot comprehend complex business logic, game-theoretic economic attack vectors, or multi-contract race conditions. Our audits combine automated fuzzing with rigorous line-by-line manual code review by senior engineers.

QWhat specific vulnerability classes do you check for in Solana Anchor programs?

We audit missing signer checks, arbitrary CPI invocations, account type confusion, PDA bump seed canonicalization, duplicate mutable account injection, integer overflows/underflows, and closing account re-initialization vulnerabilities.

QHow long does a comprehensive smart contract audit take?

A typical audit takes between 1 to 3 weeks depending on the total effective lines of code (nSLOC), instruction complexity, and protocol dependencies. We provide continuous updates and intermediate findings throughout the review period.

QWhat deliverables are included with the audit?

You receive an executive summary, a detailed vulnerability breakdown with CVSS severity scoring, working Proof-of-Concept exploit scripts, exact code refactoring recommendations, and a final verification certificate once fixes are verified.

[ TECHNICAL INSIGHTS // ENGINEERING BLOG ]

Related Content

SOLANA SECURITY

Common Account Validation Pitfalls in Solana Anchor Programs

An in-depth guide to preventing missing signer exploits, arbitrary CPI calls, and duplicate account vulnerabilities.

Read Full Article
FUZZING & AUDITING

Property-Based Invariant Fuzzing with Foundry and Trident

How to design mathematical invariant tests that automatically uncover edge-case logic failures in DeFi smart contracts.

Read Full Article
DEFI SECURITY

Mitigating Flash Loan Attack Vectors in AMM Invariant Calculations

Architecting flash-loan resistant pricing models, TWAP checks, and state assertions for on-chain markets.

Read Full Article
[ ECOSYSTEM // RELATED SERVICES ]

Related Services

DeFi Protocol DesignSERVICE // 01

DeFi Protocol Design

Engineering high-throughput decentralized finance protocols, concentrated liquidity AMMs, and algorithmic lending pools.

Wallet & Treasury SecuritySERVICE // 02

Wallet & Treasury Security

Multi-signature governance, hardware security module enclaves, and programmatic treasury custody for enterprise protocols.

Monitoring & Incident ResponseSERVICE // 03

Monitoring & Incident Response

24/7 telemetry monitoring, automated circuit breakers, and rapid containment protocols for live exploits.